Five years after the BP oil spill, the National Contingency Plan used by federal agencies to respond to major environmental threats still needs to be revamped to adjust to the lessons from the 2010 Gulf of Mexico disaster, said Jane Lubchenco, a marine biologist who ran the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration during the spill.

The response strategy, which guides how the government and the companies responsible for a disaster must respond, was conceived after the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil tanker spill in Prince William Sound, Alaska.

That's a key part of the problem, Lubchenco said. When federal officials used the strategy to respond to the BP spill, they found it was an outdated outline created to fight a limited source of oil, rather than the seemingly never-ending flow of oil from the Macondo well.

Read the full story at the Times-Picayune>>

Want to read more about the BP oil spill? Click here...

Have you listened to this article via the audio player above?

If so, send us your feedback around what we can do to improve this feature or further develop it. If not, check it out and let us know what you think via email or on social media.

A collection of stories from guest authors.

Join the Conversation