When the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) were established in 1970, it was recommended that they become part of their own oceans department or the Department of the Interior. But the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, which preceded NOAA, focused on marine resources as economic assets, so the Nixon Administration put the new agencies in the Department of Commerce, and that’s where they have remained for the last 56 years.

But many people in the industry have noticed the limitations of looking at fish strictly as economic assets, and they will be talking about it on the Fish is Food: Opening Doors for Seafood in Federal Programs Panel at the 2026 Pacific Marine Expo. “For years seafood has been treated as a commodity rather than part of the food system,” says Linda Behnken, executive director of the Alaska Longline Fishermen's Association (ALFA). “With Mike Illenberg leading the USDA’s [United States Department of Agriculture] new office of seafood, we have someone who knows the industry and can help fishermen access the programs we need.”

According to Behnken, for every $20 million the USDA provides to farmers, fishermen get $2 million. “Three percent of the USDA budget goes to seafood, and point five percent goes to wild fisheries. And the National Aquaculture Association has launched a full-on effort to make sure we don’t get any more.”

But with Illenberg, a man with a fisheries background, at the helm, Behnken believes the USDA’s Office of Seafood can provide fishermen with access to the kind of programs that farmers benefit from. “Farmers can get crop insurance, for example,” she says. “Fishermen need a similar program for when fish don’t show up. Disaster relief can take five years to pay out, and by then some boats have gone out of business. The USDA has a much quicker payout, and we need that as climate change affects more fisheries.”

The Fish is Food Panel at the 2026 PME will discuss how the new USDA Office of Seafood can benefit processors by increasing value-added capacity and worker training. Photo courtesy of Paul Molyneaux

More than that, Behken wants to see programs that will upgrade harvest and processing technology. “This isn’t just for the fishermen,” she says. “The processors need access to grants and loans that will enable them to invest in value-added capacity, especially here in Alaska, where fish are going out headed and gutted and getting value added elsewhere. We want to recapture that value and those jobs.”

The PME panel will discuss those ideas and others that apply to fisheries on all the US coasts. “Besides processing and insurance, we’re looking at improving regional food systems with things like workforce training, increasing cold storage, helping fishermen invest in their boats and gear, and rebuilding infrastructure after storms like the one that took out many of the wharves in Maine a couple of years ago.”

ALFA and many others would also like to see continued investment in energy transition from diesel to electric, and decarbonization of the fleet where feasible. “And we want to hear new ideas,” says Behnken, noting that the panel members will be listening to fishermen at PME.

Have you listened to this article via the audio player?

If so, send us your feedback around what we can do to improve this feature or further develop it. If not, check it out and let us know what you think via email or on social media.

Paul Molyneaux is the Boats & Gear editor for National Fisherman.

Join the Conversation

Primary Featured
Yes