The Oregon CCA chapter filed the state initiative in December, asserting that it sought to ban gillnet and tangle net use with the intention of establishing a fund to help harvesters switch to more selective fishing gear.
That might be fine if there were other gear that Oregon’s salmon fishermen could use. But the state’s attorney general’s office, which reviews all potential ballot-initiative items, determined that there is no alternative gear available to salmon harvesters — gillnets and tangle nets are the only legal gear Oregon law allows them to use.
The attorney general’s office changed the proposed initiative’s title to reflect that problem. Consequently, CCA withdrew the initiative in mid-February.
But before Oregon gillnetters could exhale came word that CCA is refiling the AG-altered initiative. It must gather 82,769 signatures by early July to get it on the ballot.
Oregon’s commercial salmon fishermen were proactive when the CCA chapter first filed the initiative. They actively campaigned against the proposal and developed a video to educate the public and demonstrate to them how the gear actually works. Looks like they’ll have to dust it off and remind Oregon residents once more that gillnets and tangle nets should remain on the Columbia.