What would life be like if a fisherman was president? Would the Magnuson-Stevens Act become fairer to fishermen if White House support and clout were available?
Would we see reversals of trade policies that allow vast quantities of seafood to be imported that squash dock prices? Would we see increased emphasis on and funding for more accurate stock assessments?
Would West Coast water policies be reversed to bolster the health of weakened salmon stocks? Would fisheries rationalization plans move to the back burner in favor of programs that would enable big- and small-boat fishermen to prosper?
Would the U.S. delegation to ICCAT have greater support and the muscle to ensure American swordfish and tuna fishermen get a fairer shake? Would we put more pressure on foreign nations to fish sustainably?
In short, would life get better for U.S. fishermen?
Maybe. It might be too much to ask the president to focus so much on fisheries-related matters. After all, there are pesky issues like the economy, energy prices, education, foreign affairs and health care that would likely fly higher on the radar screen.
Then again, maybe U.S. fishermen would receive more attention and help than they’ve gotten from presidents who lack a commercial fishing background.