Counsel touts fishery suits as 'education'

Shelley said that Coakley’s suit was political, while CLF’s was substantive — challenging the new opening of areas closed to fishing and allowing fishermen to carry over 10 percent of their unused 2012 quote to the 2013 fishing year.

“Our suits are not political,” Shelley added. “They’re strictly based on the facts, and we do it as a last resort.”

Yet in 2001, during a lengthy oral dissertation at a professional conference in Phoenix, Shelley provided a detailed explanation for the political benefits of suing the federal government.

Read the full story at Gloucester Times>>

About the author

© Diversified Communications. All rights reserved.