Written by Jes Hathaway
The mediation process between Alaska Seafood Processors Association (ASPA), the client group for the Alaska salmon Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) certificate, and the group of applicants seeking access to the certificate in time for 2015 harvests has failed.
Written by Brian Perkins, Regional Director Americas, Marine Stewardship Council
Editor’s Note: The following is a response to a Seafoodnews.com editorial. Read more of our ongoing coverage of Alaska and the MSC.
The MSC program has been developed with fairness and non-discrimination at its core. We deeply reject suggestions to the contrary.
MSC Standards are open, voluntary and fully compliant with FAO guidelines for the ecolabeling of fish – a consensus which has been confirmed in independent reviews by Accenture and WWF.
FAO guidelines for ecolabeling of fish
The FAO guidelines for non-discrimination state that: “Access to the services of the certification body should be open to all types of fisheries...” and “Access to certification should not be conditional upon the size or scale of the fishery nor should certification be conditional upon the number of fisheries already certified.” This is absolutely the case with the MSC Standards.
MSC assessment is open to all types, sizes and scales of fishery from any country and organization. Any organization with procedures in place to ensure the integrity of the MSC supply chain can hold an MSC Chain of Custody certificate. Organizations enter MSC certification voluntarily. MSC certified seafood is sourced, sold and consumed voluntarily.
The FAO guidelines also require that standards “Be non-discriminatory, do not create unnecessary obstacles to trade and allow for fair trade and competition.” In meeting this requirement the MSC program allows any organization, at any time to enter MSC assessment. It also sets requirements which facilitate certificate sharing in order to maximize the use of existing certificates by eligible companies, and minimize the number of overlapping certificates. However, as every fishery is unique, we do not prescribe the mechanism by which organizations share certificates.
How this applies for Alaska salmon
The requirements above apply to Alaska salmon processors in the same way as to any other fishery: The opportunity to either join the fishery certificate or initiate a separate assessment has existed for the Alaska salmon processors outside the client group since 2012. However, no such agreement or certificate was sought until early April 2015.
Responding to calls from the applicant groups to assist in finding a fast and amicable agreement for cost-sharing mechanism, the MSC is helping to facilitate this process. The discussions between ASPA and the applicant client group are now underway with the assistance of an independent adjudicator.
Contrary to Sackton’s claims, MSC stands to benefit from certificate sharing as it will result in more MSC product going to market. However, it is our firm belief, and a requirement of our Standards, that these commercial negotiations remain between the client group and the applicant organizations.
There are many examples of MSC fisheries certificates which are shared by a client group consisting of multiple independent organizations. In most cases it has been possible for organizations to find a win-win situation where they are able to share the costs associated with certifying a fishery. Examples include:
• Canadian cold water shrimp and prawn fisheries which, previously MSC certified under multiple certificates, are now working together to achieve joint certification.
• The MINSA North East Atlantic mackerel fisheries which previously achieved MSC certification as seven separate fisheries and are now under assessment as a single fishery.
• The Iceland Sustainable Fisheries (ISF) initiative which is bringing numerous Icelandic fisheries together under shared MSC certificates.
• The Alaskan flat fish fishery and British Columbian sockeye salmon which, like Alaska salmon, include numerous organizations amongst their client group.
We are hopeful that continued dialogue between the parties will deliver an equitable and timely solution.
Read more about MSC Alaska >>
Written by Doug Stewart
Twenty companies seeking access to the Marine Stewardship Council’s certification of the Alaska Salmon fishery, along with the existing Silver Bay client group that has denied access, will meet with a mediator today in Seattle.
Written by Doug Stewart
FRANKFURT — A Burmese migrant worker is sold by traffickers as a slave to the owner of a Thai fishing boat. The catch of the boat is used to make fish meal to feed farmed shrimp. The shrimp wind up in supermarkets in the United States and Europe.
Written by Doug Stewart
The Christie administration is trying to again block a Rutgers University-led research group from blasting sound waves on the ocean floor, saying it will harm marine life and disrupt the state’s $1 billion commercial and recreational fishing industry.
Page 86 of 407
NOAA recently published a proposed rule that would implement a traceability plan to help combat IUU fishing. The program would seek to trace the origins of imported seafood by setting up reporting and filing procedures for products entering the U.S.
The traceability program would collect data on harvest, landing, and chain of custody of fish and fish products that have been identified as particularly vulnerable to IUU fishing and fraud.Read more...
The following was released by the Maine Department of Marine Resources on Jan. 22:
The Maine Department of Marine Resources announced an emergency regulation that will support the continued rebuilding effort in Maine’s scallop fishery. The rule, effective January 23, 2016, will close the Muscle Ridge Area near South Thomaston and the Western Penobscot Bay Area.Read more...