Written by Jen Finn
February 15, 2013
The senior counsel for the Conservation Law Foundation may be arguing for all the wrong reasons, but he makes a valid point:
When it comes to the 2013 Gulf of Maine commercial cod fishing season, which begins May 1, the New England Fishery Management Council and NOAA might be better off simply shutting down the fishery than going forward with its current cut of up to 77 percent in fishermen's allowable catch.
For the cuts are so dire in that stock, especially, that the limit will likely cover only the cod bycatch that fishermen haul up while targeting other species. And that will mean fishermen — perhaps after a trip or two at the start of the new fishing year, will not be able to target Gulf of Maine cod at all over the coming year, or in 2014, when these industry-killing limits are pegged to remain in place.
That was not the reason cited by Conservation Law Foundation senior counsel Peter Shelley in his newsletter posting out of last month's regional council meeting. Shelley, of course, writes that "recent assessments showed stocks at the lowest levels and declining rapidly. The fish just aren't there anymore" — clearly accepting the latest NOAA assessment dat a, even though the data is being widely questioned by fishermen, and even though NOAA's "scientific" assessment, as usual, included no input or cooperative research from rank and file fishermen who know the business.
Yet, New Hampshire groundfisherman David Goethel, at the January fishery management council meeting, argued for the same thing: a cod fishery shutdown.
Read the full story at the Gloucester Daily Times>>
The Northeast Fisheries Science Center has announced that Dr. Jon Hare has been selected to serve as the permanent science and research director effective Oct. 31.Read more ...
It’s no secret that fraud is a problem in the seafood industry. Oceana repeatedly touts a mislabeling epidemic. While their method has been criticized, the perception of rampant fraud has been established.Read more ...