Written by Jen Finn
May 9, 2013
The relatively rare, unified stand by all eight U.S. fishery management councils calling for more flexibility within the Magnuson-Stevens Act may not make a whit's bit of difference for fishermen and waterfront businesses in Gloucester and elsewhere.
That's because these councils, which can make proposals and advise NOAA leaders on fishery policies, can't affect anything beyond that, as local fishermen, waterfront business owners and even state and federal lawmakers have come to know all too well. NOAA Northeast Administrator John Bullard paid no mind to the New England Council's recommendation for a second year of more reasonable cod limits, before standing by the cuts of up to 78 percent that are now in place — just as his predecessor, Patricia Kurkul, more than once overruled council votes of 16-1 when she was the "one."
But in taking their announced, united stand at the start of a three-day fishery management conference in the nation's capital, the eight councils — who deal with vastly different fishing worlds and issues from here to Alaska — have sent a clear signal not only to NOAA, but to the giant nonprofit organizations like the Pew Environment Group, which, like its allies, continues to carry far too much weight on these councils regarding fisheries issues, and which is a primary financial sponsor of this week's supposedly neutral, NOAA-led conference.
Read the full story at Gloucester Times>>
The Northeast Fisheries Science Center has announced that Dr. Jon Hare has been selected to serve as the permanent science and research director effective Oct. 31.Read more ...
It’s no secret that fraud is a problem in the seafood industry. Oceana repeatedly touts a mislabeling epidemic. While their method has been criticized, the perception of rampant fraud has been established.Read more ...