Jes Hathaway is the editor in chief of National Fisherman magazine and NationalFisherman.com.
Written by Adrianne Madden
July 1, 2009
I have to admit, when I read the news of Exxon's opting not to appeal the 9th Circuit Court's ruling that the oil giant must pay interest on its meager settlement in the 20-year Valdez fight I was first excited for the stakeholders, then a little suspicious.
Why would Exxon give up their epic battle now, especially after their series of victories that slowly ratcheted down the damages due from $5 billion to roughly $500 million?
Perhaps they fired all of their ace lawyers and decided it was time to fare well in the court of public opinion for once. But one tiny concession is not likely to curry too much favor with Alaskans, who value all of their natural resources and won't soon forget this two-decade war.
Maybe the truth is Exxon saw the writing on the wall with this one. After all, that's what high-powered, well-paid attorneys are for: to provide stellar representation and a reasonable assessment of the outcome of the fight. And they certainly were right in their push to take the damages case all the way to the Supreme Court. (I wonder if Norm Coleman wishes he'd had the same legal team.)
So there you have it. Big oil's answer to the O.J. Simpson trial has finally been put to rest, and the check's in the mail.
The Center for Coastal Studies recently announced that Owen Nichols, Director of the Center for Coastal Studies’ Marine Fisheries Research Program, has been selected as this year’s recipient of the John Annala Fishery Leadership Award by the Gulf of Maine Research Institute.Read more ...
Cummins announced the opening of a new Alaska service location on Kodiak Island last week that will serve as a service and support location for commercial marine applications.Read more ...