Jes Hathaway is the editor in chief of National Fisherman magazine and NationalFisherman.com.
Written by Adrianne Madden
Wednesday, 01 July 2009
I have to admit, when I read the news of Exxon's opting not to appeal the 9th Circuit Court's ruling that the oil giant must pay interest on its meager settlement in the 20-year Valdez fight I was first excited for the stakeholders, then a little suspicious.
Why would Exxon give up their epic battle now, especially after their series of victories that slowly ratcheted down the damages due from $5 billion to roughly $500 million?
Perhaps they fired all of their ace lawyers and decided it was time to fare well in the court of public opinion for once. But one tiny concession is not likely to curry too much favor with Alaskans, who value all of their natural resources and won't soon forget this two-decade war.
Maybe the truth is Exxon saw the writing on the wall with this one. After all, that's what high-powered, well-paid attorneys are for: to provide stellar representation and a reasonable assessment of the outcome of the fight. And they certainly were right in their push to take the damages case all the way to the Supreme Court. (I wonder if Norm Coleman wishes he'd had the same legal team.)
So there you have it. Big oil's answer to the O.J. Simpson trial has finally been put to rest, and the check's in the mail.
Legislators from Connecticut and Massachusetts complained about the current “out-of-date allocation formula” in black sea bass, summer flounder and scup fisheries in a letter to the U.S. Department of Commerce earlier this week.Read more...
The Southeast Alaska Fishermen’s Alliance recently announced that the National Marine Sanctuary Foundation has awarded the organization a Hollings Grant to reduce whale entanglements in Alaska salmon fisheries by increasing the use of acoustic whale pingers to minimize entanglements in fishing gear.