Jes Hathaway is the editor in chief of National Fisherman magazine and NationalFisherman.com.
Thursday, 01 May 2008
It's hard to believe, in this economy, that some folks in Alabama are pushing to buy out gillnet fishermen. And yet…
Fortunately, the ban stalled in the state Legislature yesterday when Senate republicans tried to replace the bill with a version the House passed last year. That version would make the gillnet buyouts voluntary and provide funds for a five-year study on the effects of the nets on local fish stocks.
Sounds pretty reasonable to me. In the grand scheme of fisheries management, five years is a blip on the radar. And a study, perhaps followed by a mandatory buyout, seems like the least we can do to be sure that we're eliminating jobs — not to mention a way of life and family legacies — in order to preserve fish stocks.
Otherwise, we're firing folks in a bad economy because one group feels like it's the right thing to do.
National Fisherman Live: 11/06/14
In this episode:
NOAA report touts 2013 landings, value increases
Panama fines GM salmon company Aquabounty
Gulf council passes Reef Fish Amendment 40
Maine elver quota cut by 2,000 pounds
Offshore mussel farm would be East Coast’s first