Written by Adrianne Madden
Friday, 17 July 2009
When people talk about making short-term sacrifices to achieve long-term benefits, how short a period are they talking about?
I read a story online today, courtesy of WWAY-TV in Wilmington, N.C., about new federal regulations http://www.wwaytv3.com/some_believe_new_fishing_regulations_are_hook/07/2009 that will be imposed upon South Atlantic snapper and grouper harvesters beginning July 29. They limit the amount of snapper and grouper they can catch, and mandate closures lasting several months.
Federal regulators say the measures are needed to reduce overfishing and protect these species. Fishermen disagree; what they see on the water doesn't jive with what the stock assessments tell the regulators.
But what struck me most as I read the story was a quote attributed to NOAA stating, "We're willing to accept short-term losses that could have long-term economic gains by having high stocks, high yields and healthy ecosystems."
What short-term losses is NOAA suffering? Is it trying to figure out how it's going to make its boat and mortgage payments?
I'm taking the quote with a grain of salt, because the story doesn't attribute the quote to a person, just NOAA. So color me surprised that anyone in the agency would make that cavalier a statement.
Then again, this business about making short-term sacrifices for long-term gains is routinely trotted out when harvesting restrictions designed to rebuild fish stocks are implemented — usually by folks who don't have to actually make the sacrifices.
New England groundfish harvesters heard it at least 15 years ago (and probably longer) as regulators began trying to rebuild the region's flatfish stocks.
And here we are all these years later. Vessels and permits have been bought out. Days at sea have been slashed to a bare minimum and various other effort controls have been implemented. The fleet's size has dwindled considerably, and further consolidation is likely with catch share management's arrival in 2010.
But those are all short-term sacrifices, right? For the folks who have to fish in the here and now, the economic gains they've been promised are long overdue.
The anti-mining group Salmon Beyond Borders expressed disappointment and dismay last week at Alaska Governor Bill Walker’s announcement that he has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with B.C. Premier Christy Clark.
This came just days after his administration asked members of his newly-formed Transboundary Rivers Citizens Advisory Work Group to provide comment on a Draft Statement of Cooperation associated with Transboundary mining.Read more...
NMFS recently released a draft action plan for fish discard and release mortality science, creating a list of actions that they hope can better inform fisheries.
We know that fishermen have to deal with bycatch by discarding or releasing unwanted catch overboard, but there is a data gap regarding how those fish survive.Read more...