Written by Adrianne Madden
Friday, 17 July 2009
When people talk about making short-term sacrifices to achieve long-term benefits, how short a period are they talking about?
I read a story online today, courtesy of WWAY-TV in Wilmington, N.C., about new federal regulations http://www.wwaytv3.com/some_believe_new_fishing_regulations_are_hook/07/2009 that will be imposed upon South Atlantic snapper and grouper harvesters beginning July 29. They limit the amount of snapper and grouper they can catch, and mandate closures lasting several months.
Federal regulators say the measures are needed to reduce overfishing and protect these species. Fishermen disagree; what they see on the water doesn't jive with what the stock assessments tell the regulators.
But what struck me most as I read the story was a quote attributed to NOAA stating, "We're willing to accept short-term losses that could have long-term economic gains by having high stocks, high yields and healthy ecosystems."
What short-term losses is NOAA suffering? Is it trying to figure out how it's going to make its boat and mortgage payments?
I'm taking the quote with a grain of salt, because the story doesn't attribute the quote to a person, just NOAA. So color me surprised that anyone in the agency would make that cavalier a statement.
Then again, this business about making short-term sacrifices for long-term gains is routinely trotted out when harvesting restrictions designed to rebuild fish stocks are implemented — usually by folks who don't have to actually make the sacrifices.
New England groundfish harvesters heard it at least 15 years ago (and probably longer) as regulators began trying to rebuild the region's flatfish stocks.
And here we are all these years later. Vessels and permits have been bought out. Days at sea have been slashed to a bare minimum and various other effort controls have been implemented. The fleet's size has dwindled considerably, and further consolidation is likely with catch share management's arrival in 2010.
But those are all short-term sacrifices, right? For the folks who have to fish in the here and now, the economic gains they've been promised are long overdue.
The following was released by the Maine Department of Marine Resources on Jan. 22:
The Maine Department of Marine Resources announced an emergency regulation that will support the continued rebuilding effort in Maine’s scallop fishery. The rule, effective January 23, 2016, will close the Muscle Ridge Area near South Thomaston and the Western Penobscot Bay Area.Read more...
Louisiana’s Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, which governs commercial and recreational fishing in the state, got a new boss in January. Charlie Melancon, a former member of the U.S. House of Representatives and state legislator, was appointed to the job by the state’s new governor, John Bel Edwards.
Although much of his non-political work in the past has centered on the state’s sugar cane industry, Melancon said he is confident that other experience, including working closely with fishermen when in Congress, has prepared him well for this new challenge.Read more...